4.7 Article

Computational study of paroxetine-like inhibitors reveals new molecular insight to inhibit GRK2 with selectivity over ROCK1

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48949-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea grant (MRC) [2015-009070]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2016RID1AIB01007060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The G-protein coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) regulates the desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors (beta-AR), and its overexpression has been implicated in heart failure. Hence, the inhibition of GRK2 is considered to be an important drug target for the treatment of heart failure. Due to the high sequence similarity of GRK2 with the A, G, and C family (AGC family) of kinases, the inhibition of GRK2 also leads to the inhibition of AGC kinases such as Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase 1 (ROCK1). Therefore, unraveling the mechanisms to selectively inhibit GRK2 poses an important challenge. We have performed molecular docking, three dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship (3D-QSAR), molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and free energy calculations techniques on a series of 53 paroxetine-like compounds to understand the structural properties desirable for enhancing the inhibitory activity for GRK2 with selectivity over ROCK1. The formation of stable hydrogen bond interactions with the residues Phe202 and Lys220 of GRK2 seems to be important for selective inhibition of GRK2. Electropositive substituents at the piperidine ring and electronegative substituents near the amide linker between the benzene ring and pyrazole ring showed a higher inhibitory preference for GRK2 over ROCK1. This study may be used in designing more potent and selective GRK2 inhibitors for therapeutic intervention of heart failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available