4.7 Article

Shape Effect on the Refractive Index Sensitivity at Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Inflection Points of Single Gold Nanocubes with Vertices

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50032-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIP) [2018R1C1B3001154]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130000138] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasmonic gold nanoparticles with sharp tips and vertices, such as gold bipyramids (AuBPs) and gold nanocubes (AuNCs), have been widely used for high-sensitivity localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) sensing. However, conventional LSPR sensors based on frequency shifts have a major disadvantage: the asymmetry and broadening of LSPR peaks because of instrumental, environmental, and chemical noises that limit the precise determination of shift positions. Herein, we demonstrated an alternative method to improve the efficiency of the sensors by focusing on homogeneous LSPR scattering inflection points (IFs) of single gold nanoparticles with a single resonant mode. In addition, we investigated the effect of the shape and vertices of AuNCs on the refractive index (RI) sensitivity of homogeneous LSPR IFs by comparing with gold nanospheres (AuNSs) of similar size. The results show that for both AuNCs and AuNSs, tracking homogeneous LSPR IFs allows for higher RI sensitivity than tracking the frequency shifts of the LSPR peaks. Furthermore, single AuNCs with vertices exhibited higher RI sensitivity than single AuNSs of similar size in the homogeneous LSPR IFs. Therefore, we provided a deeper insight into the RI sensitivity of homogeneous LSPR IFs of AuNCs with vertices for their use in LSPR-based biosensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available