4.7 Article

In vitro evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa AA2 biofilms in the presence of cystic fibrosis lung microbiome members

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49371-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [203141/Z/16/Z]
  2. Odysseus grant of the Research Foundation Flanders [G.0.E53.14N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In cystic fibrosis (CF) airways, the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa evolves from an acute to a chronic infection phenotype. Yet, the in vivo factors influencing the evolutionary trajectory of P. aeruginosa are poorly understood. This study aimed at understanding the role of the CF lung microbiome in P. aeruginosa evolution. Therefore, we investigated the in vitro biofilm evolution of an early CF P. aeruginosa isolate, AA2, in the presence or absence of a synthetic CF lung microbiome. Whole genome sequencing of evolved populations revealed mutations in quorum sensing (QS) genes (lasR, pqsR) with and without the microbiome. Phenotypic assays confirmed decreased production of the QS molecule 3-O-C-12-homoserine lactone, and QS-regulated virulence factors pyocyanin and protease. Furthermore, a mixture of lasR and lasR pqsR mutants was found, in which double mutants showed less pyocyanin and protease production than lasR mutants. While the microbial community did not influence the production of the tested P. aeruginosa virulence factors, we observed a trend towards more mutations in the transcriptional regulators gntR and mexL when P. aeruginosa was grown alone. P. aeruginosa developed resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics during evolution, when grown with and without the microbiome. In conclusion, in an experimental biofilm environment, the early P. aeruginosa CF isolate AA2 evolves towards a CF-like genotype and phenotype, and most studied evolutionary adaptations are not impacted by CF microbiome members.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available