4.7 Article

Application of Quantum Annealing to Nurse Scheduling Problem

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49172-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Osaka University
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [19J11073]
  3. Department of Energy Office of Science Early Career Research Program
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2016M3D1A1919181]
  5. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  7. Creative Materials Discovery Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19J11073] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum annealing is a promising heuristic method to solve combinatorial optimization problems, and efforts to quantify performance on real-world problems provide insights into how this approach may be best used in practice. We investigate the empirical performance of quantum annealing to solve the Nurse Scheduling Problem (NSP) with hard constraints using the D-Wave 2000Q quantum annealing device. NSP seeks the optimal assignment for a set of nurses to shifts under an accompanying set of constraints on schedule and personnel. After reducing NSP to a novel Ising-type Hamiltonian, we evaluate the solution quality obtained from the D-Wave 2000Q against the constraint requirements as well as the diversity of solutions. For the test problems explored here, our results indicate that quantum annealing recovers satisfying solutions for NSP and suggests the heuristic method is potentially achievable for practical use. Moreover, we observe that solution quality can be greatly improved through the use of reverse annealing, in which it is possible to refine returned results by using the annealing process a second time. We compare the performance of NSP using both forward and reverse annealing methods and describe how this approach might be used in practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available