4.7 Article

Topography and behavioral relevance of the global signal in the human brain

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50750-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH107549, R01MH107549-03S1]
  2. Canadian Institute
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [BZ2/2-1, BZ2/3-1, BZ2/4-1, IRTG2150]
  4. Amazon AWS Research Grants
  5. German National Merit Foundation
  6. START-Program of the Faculty of Medicine [126/16]
  7. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  8. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  9. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante
  10. Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF) Fellowship
  11. Exploratory Research Space [OPSF449]
  12. RWTH Aachen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The global signal in resting-state functional MRI data is considered to be dominated by physiological noise and artifacts, yet a growing literature suggests that it also carries information about widespread neural activity. The biological relevance of the global signal remains poorly understood. Applying principal component analysis to a large neuroimaging dataset, we found that individual variation in global signal topography recapitulates well-established patterns of large-scale functional brain networks. Using canonical correlation analysis, we delineated relationships between individual differences in global signal topography and a battery of phenotypes. The first canonical variate of the global signal, resembling the frontoparietal control network, was significantly related to an axis of positive and negative life outcomes and psychological function. These results suggest that the global signal contains a rich source of information related to trait-level cognition and behavior. This work has significant implications for the contentious debate over artifact removal practices in neuroimaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available