4.4 Article

After the Lights Go Out: Household Resilience to Electrical Grid Failure Following Hurricane Irma

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000335

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Colorado Natural Hazards Center through its Quick Response Grant Program - National Science Foundation [CMMI1030670]
  2. National Science Foundation [1520803]
  3. School of Human Evolution and Social Change at Arizona State University
  4. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1520803] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In September 2017, Hurricane Irma turned off power for 6.7 million people in the state of Florida. Despite increasing threats to the US electrical grid, there are few studies on household impacts from prolonged power failure. The authors conducted interviews with 42 residents of Highlands and Orange Counties, Florida, following the hurricane. Interviews reflect a range of socioeconomic statuses, genders, ages, and neighborhood characteristics. Classic patterns of resilience emerged in quantitative and qualitative analysis. Households with White respondents, higher incomes, and fewer elderly, very young, or non-English speaking residents demonstrated increased resilience to the storm and subsequent blackout. Respondents who identified as White were two and a half times as likely to report using a generator than residents identifying with any other racialized groups. Households with children younger than 6 living in the home were five times as likely to report difficulty accessing food and water than those without young children. This study provides groundwork for further analysis of blackout hazards and can be used to increase household and community resilience to future blackout events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available