4.8 Article

Chemical Exfoliation as a Controlled Route to Enhance the Anodic Performance of COF in LIB

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 48, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201902428

Keywords

anodic covalent organic nanosheets; chemical exfoliation; full cell lithium ion batteries; functionalizing exfoliation agents; lithium storage

Funding

  1. IISER-Pune
  2. DST [DST/TMD/MES/2k17/103, EMR/2016/003553]
  3. DST-Inspire
  4. SERB [EMR/2016]
  5. MHRD-FAST
  6. IUSSTF program
  7. IISER Pune

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A covalent organic framework (COF), built from light atoms with a graphitic structure, could be an excellent anodic candidate for lightweight batteries, which can be of use in portable devices. But to replace the commercial graphite anode, they need more Li-interactive sites/unit-cell and all such sites should be made to participate. The compromise made in the volumetric density to gain the gravimetric advantage should be minimal. Exfoliation enhances surface/functional group accessibility yielding high capacity and rapid charge storage. A chemical strategy for simultaneous exfoliation and increase of Li-loving active-pockets can deliver a lightweight Li-ion battery (LIB). Here, anthracene-based COFs are chemically exfoliated into few-layer-thick nanosheets using maleic anhydride as a functionalizing exfoliation agent. It not only exfoliates but also introduces multiple Li-interactive carbonyl groups, leading to a loading of 30 Li/unit-cell (vs one Li per C-6). The exfoliation enhances the specific capacity by approximate to 4 times (200-790 mAh g(-1) @100 mA g(-1)). A realistic full-cell, made using the exfoliated COF against a LiCoO2 cathode, delivers a specific capacity of 220 mAh g(-1) over 200 cycles. The observed capacity stands highest among all organic polymers. For the first report of a COF derived full-cell LIB, this is a windfall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available