4.8 Article

AMPA receptors in the synapse turnover by monomer diffusion

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13229-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17K15090, 19K16074, 15H04351, 18H02401, 19H03370, 16K14695, 17K19521, 24247029, 16H06386]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [23110006, 23110001, 18H04671]
  3. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology project of Creation of Fundamental Technologies for Understanding and Control of Biosystem Dynamics of Japan Science and Technology Agency
  4. World Premiere Research Center Initiative of the MEXT
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H03370, 19K16074, 18H04671, 16H06386, 15H04351, 18H02401, 16K14695, 17K15090, 17K19521] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number and subunit compositions of AMPA receptors (AMPARs), hetero- or homo-tetramers composed of four subunits GluA1-4, in the synapse is carefully tuned to sustain basic synaptic activity. This enables stimulation-induced synaptic plasticity, which is central to learning and memory. The AMPAR tetramers have been widely believed to be stable from their formation in the endoplasmic reticulum until their proteolytic decomposition. However, by observing GluA1 and GluA2 at the level of single molecules, we find that the homo- and heterotetramers are metastable, instantaneously falling apart into monomers, dimers, or trimers (in 100 and 200 ms, respectively), which readily form tetramers again. In the dendritic plasma membrane, GluA1 and GluA2 monomers and dimers are far more mobile than tetramers and enter and exit from the synaptic regions. We conclude that AMPAR turnover by lateral diffusion, essential for sustaining synaptic function, is largely done by monomers of AMPAR subunits, rather than preformed tetramers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available