4.8 Article

Identification and characterization of Cardiac Glycosides as senolytic compounds

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12888-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deputacion de Coruna [BINV-CS/2019]
  2. MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE [RTI2018-095818-B-100]
  3. IMDEA Food Institute
  4. Ramon Areces Foundation [CIVP18A3891]
  5. Ramon y Cajal Award (MICINN) [RYC-2017-22335]
  6. Talento Modalidad-1 Program Grant, Madrid Regional Government [2018-T1/BIO-11262]
  7. Long Term EMBO Fellowship [ALTF-358-2017]
  8. PhD4MD Programme of the IRB
  9. IDIBAPS
  10. IRB
  11. Spanish Ministry of Economy
  12. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [SAF2013-48256-R]
  13. European Research Council [ERC-2014-AdG/669622]
  14. laCaixa Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compounds with specific cytotoxic activity in senescent cells, or senolytics, support the causal involvement of senescence in aging and offer therapeutic interventions. Here we report the identification of Cardiac Glycosides (CGs) as a family of compounds with senolytic activity. CGs, by targeting the Na+/K+ATPase pump, cause a disbalanced electrochemical gradient within the cell causing depolarization and acidification. Senescent cells present a slightly depolarized plasma membrane and higher concentrations of H+, making them more susceptible to the action of CGs. These vulnerabilities can be exploited for therapeutic purposes as evidenced by the in vivo eradication of tumors xenografted in mice after treatment with the combination of a senogenic and a senolytic drug. The senolytic effect of CGs is also effective in the elimination of senescence-induced lung fibrosis. This experimental approach allows the identification of compounds with senolytic activity that could potentially be used to develop effective treatments against age-related diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available