4.8 Article

Missing-linker metal-organic frameworks for oxygen evolution reaction

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13051-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0108300]
  2. Thousand Youth Talents Plan of China
  3. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Program [2017XK2026]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation project [JCYJ20180307151313532]
  5. 100 Talents Plan Foundation of Sun Yat-sen University
  6. Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams [2017ZT07C069]
  7. NSFC [21872174, 21821003, 201875287, 21890380]
  8. Thousand Youth Talents Plan of Guangdong Province
  9. Hundred Youth Talents Program of Hunan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been recognized as compelling platforms for the development of miscellaneous applications because of their structural diversity and functional tunability. Here, we propose that the electrocatalytic properties could be well modified by incorporating missing linkers into the MOF. Theoretical calculations suggest the electronic structure of MOFs can be tuned by introducing missing linkers, which improves oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance of the MOF. Inspired by these aspects, we introduced various missing linkers into a layered-pillared MOF Co-2(OH)(2)(C8H4O4) (termed as CoBDC) to prepare missing-linker MOFs. Transmission electron microscope and synchrotron X-ray measurements confirmed that the missing linkers in the MOF could be introduced and well controlled by our strategy. The self-supported MOF nanoarrays with missing linkers of carboxyferrocene exhibit excellent OER performance with ultralow overpotential of 241 mV at 100 mA cm(-2). This work opens a new prospect to develop efficient MOF-based electro-catalysts by introducing missing linkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available