4.8 Article

Hydrogen bond guidance and aromatic stacking drive liquid-liquid phase separation of intrinsically disordered histidine-rich peptides

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13469-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) through an Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier 2 grant [MOE2015-T2-1-062]
  2. Strategic Initiative on Biomimetic and Sustainable Materials (IBSM) at NTU
  3. Academy of Finland Center of Excellence in Molecular Engineering of Biosynthetic Hybrid Materials (HYBER)
  4. Academy of Finland [315140]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [315140, 315140] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) is involved in both intracellular membraneless organelles and extracellular tissues. Despite growing understanding of LLPS, molecular-level mechanisms behind this process are still not fully established. Here, we use histidine-rich squid beak proteins (HBPs) as model IDPs to shed light on molecular interactions governing LLPS. We show that LLPS of HBPs is mediated though specific modular repeats. The morphology of separated phases (liquid-like versus hydrogels) correlates with the repeats' hydrophobicity. Solution-state NMR indicates that LLPS is a multistep process initiated by deprotonation of histidine residues, followed by transient hydrogen bonding with tyrosine, and eventually by hydrophobic interactions. The microdroplets are stabilized by aromatic clustering of tyrosine residues exhibiting restricted molecular mobility in the nano-to-microsecond timescale according to solid-state NMR experiments. Our findings provide guidelines to rationally design pH-responsive peptides with LLPS ability for various applications, including bioinspired protocells and smart drug-delivery systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available