4.8 Article

Protein determinants of dissemination and host specificity of metallo-β-lactamases

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11615-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AI100560, R01AI063517, R01AI072219]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT)
  3. Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs from the Biomedical Laboratory Research & Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development [1I01BX001974]
  4. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center VISN 10
  5. ANPCyT
  6. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [BFU2009-09200, IPT2011-0964-900000]
  7. European Commission [DIVINOCELL FP7 HEALTH-F3-2009-223431]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The worldwide dissemination of metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs), mediating resistance to carbapenem antibiotics, is a major public health problem. The extent of dissemination of MBLs such as VIM-2, SPM-1 and NDM among Gram-negative pathogens cannot be explained solely based on the associated mobile genetic elements or the resistance phenotype. Here, we report that MBL host range is determined by the impact of MBL expression on bacterial fitness. The signal peptide sequence of MBLs dictates their adaptability to each host. In uncommon hosts, inefficient processing of MBLs leads to accumulation of toxic intermediates that compromises bacterial growth. This fitness cost explains the exclusion of VIM-2 and SPM-1 from Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii, and their confinement to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. By contrast, NDMs are expressed without any apparent fitness cost in different bacteria, and are secreted into outer membrane vesicles. We propose that the successful dissemination and adaptation of MBLs to different bacterial hosts depend on protein determinants that enable host adaptability and carbapenem resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available