4.5 Article

Prevalence of DLL3, CTLA-4 and MSTN Expression in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer

Journal

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 10043-10055

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S216362

Keywords

small cell lung cancer; DLL3; CTLA-4; MSTN; prognosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773207, 81372306]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [17YFZCSY00840, 18PTZWHZ00240, 19YFZCSY00040]
  3. Special Support Program for High Tech Leader & Team of Tianjin [TJTZJH-GCCCXCYTD-2-6]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction. Immune-based and antibody-drug conjugate therapies have shown promise in the treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, better predictive biomarkers are needed for selection of the appropriate SCLC patients for these advanced therapies and also for evaluation of the efficacy of these treatments. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the expression of delta-like protein 3 (DLL3), cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), and mesothelin (MSTN) in patients with SCLC and compare them with those patients' clinical characteristics. Methods. Immunohistochemical analyses of DLL3, CTLA-4 and MSTN expression were performed in 38 samples from patients with SCLC. Results: We found that positive expression in patients of the biomarkers was as follows: for DLL3, 100% (38/38), for CTLA-4, 89.5% (36/38) and for MSTN 81.5% (31/38). The median survival time was 17.9 months in the DLL3 high expression group and 23 months in the DLL3 low expression group. Patients with a high expression of DLL3 showed a poorer prognosis than those with a low expression of DLL3 (HR=3.4; 95% CI, 1.34-8.6; p=0.01). Conclusion: The expression of DLL3, CTLA-4 and MSTN was not correlated with patients' age, sex, smoking status, stage, and tumor metastasis. The fact that there was a higher expression of DLL3, CTLA-4, and MSTN in SCLC suggested that these molecules could be used as predictive biomarkers for SCLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available