4.5 Article

Circular RNA circ-Foxo3 induced cell apoptosis in urothelial carcinoma via interaction with miR-191-5p

Journal

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 8085-8094

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S215823

Keywords

bladder cancer; circular RNA; apoptosis; circ-Foxo3; miR-191

Funding

  1. postdoctoral scientific research developmental fund of Heilongjiang Province [LBH-Q17103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Circular RNAs (circRNAs) play a critical role in cancer. Emerging evidence has shown circ-Foxo3, a circRNA, was dysregulated in a variety of tumor types. However, the exact role of circ-Foxo3 in bladder cancer has never been studied. Methods: We measured the expression level of circ-Foxo3 in human and murine bladder cancer tissues and in various human bladder cancer cell lines. We induced bladder cancer in mice by a carcinogen N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine (BBN). circ-Foxo3 was overexpressed in mice by lentiviral gene transfer and in cultured cells via overexpression plasmid. The effect of circ-Foxo3 on apoptosis was examined via apoptotic marker staining, Western blot, and flow cytometry. We further characterized the interaction between circ-Foxo3 and miR-191 and its functional impact on bladder cancer cells. Results: circ-Foxo3 was downregulated in bladder cancer in vivo and in vitro, and was upregulated in response to apoptotic stress. Overexpression of circ-Foxo3 promoted bladder cancer cell apoptosis in BBN mice and in human bladder cancer cell lines. miR-191-5p suppressed circ-Foxo3 expression and the pro-apoptotic effect of circ-Foxo3 in bladder cancer cells via directly targeting the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of circ-Foxo3. Conclusion: circ-Foxo3 was downregulated in bladder cancer in vivo and in vitro, and promoted bladder cancer apoptosis via direct interaction with miR-191. circ-Foxo3 could be a potential therapeutic target for bladder cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available