4.5 Article

Nurse leaders' perceptions and experiences of leading evidence: A qualitative enquiry

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 1859-1868

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12886

Keywords

barriers to research utilization; evidence-based practice; nursing leadership; public health

Funding

  1. Finnish Nurses Association
  2. Akava Association of Nurses and Health Science Academic Leaders and Experts Taja
  3. City of Helsinki's Social and Health Services

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The aim of this study was to describe nurse leaders' perceptions and experiences of leading evidence-based practices (EBP). Background Leaders can promote EBP in nursing with their own personal example and by striving to renew structures, processes and working cultures. However, previous studies have shown that nurse leaders have tended to be passive with regard to EBP. Methods An interview study using general qualitative methods. In total, 33 individual interviews and seven focus groups of leaders were conducted in 2015 and 2017. Data were analysed thematically. Results The respondents were unfamiliar with EBP as activities that lead to effective patient care. EBP were described as indistinguishable from other practices, lost and random. Overall, they lacked competence with EBP. The activities of nurse leaders do indicate a tentative commitment to EBP, but their main goals seem to be maintaining the status quo. Conclusion Unfamiliarity with EBP reflects adversely on the operations of an entire organisation. The nurse leaders have an opportunity to enhance their understanding with EBP, which will lead to the renewal and improvement of the operating culture and the quality of strategic leadership. Implications for nursing management Leaders should take clear responsibility for EBP on the strategic, operational and educational level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available