4.5 Article

Prognostic Impact of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgical Resection

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 43, Issue 12, Pages 3153-3160

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05159-9

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Increasing evidence suggests that cancer-associated inflammation, as indicated by markers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), predicts poor outcomes in pancreatic cancer. In this study, the associations between systemic inflammation markers and survival were examined in borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by surgical resection.' Methods From April 2009 to December 2017, 119 patients diagnosed with BR-PDAC and receiving NACRT followed by radical surgery were included in this retrospective study. The associations between the pre- and post-NACRT NLR, PLR, mGPS, and clinicopathological characteristics, as well as their predictive values for survival outcomes, were analyzed. This study was approved by an institutional review board at Yokohama City University (B180600049). Results On multivariate analysis with a Cox's proportional hazards regression model, post-NACRT NLR >= 3 (p = 0.040; hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% CI 1.28-3.91) and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002; hazard ratio, 2.33; 95% CI 1.36-3.99) were significantly associated with shorter overall survival. The median survival time was 22.0 months for patients with post-NACRT NLR >= 3 and 45.0 months for patients with post-NACRT NLR <3 (p = 0.028). Conclusions The NLR following NACRT might predict survival in BR-PDAC patients. Patients with an elevated post-NACRT NLR or positive lymph node metastasis may be candidates for stronger adjuvant therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available