4.6 Article

GroE Chaperonins Assisted Functional Expression of Bacterial Enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 113, Issue 10, Pages 2149-2155

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25980

Keywords

metabolic engineering; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Escherichia coli; GroE chaperonins; post-translation; xylose isomerase

Funding

  1. Energy Biosciences Institute
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21476130]
  3. Research Inititive Program of KRIBB
  4. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [KGM4631633] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid advances in the capabilities of reading and writing DNA along with increasing understanding of microbial metabolism at the systems-level have paved an incredible path for metabolic engineering. Despite these advances, post-translational tools facilitating functional expression of heterologous enzymes in model hosts have not been developed well. Some bacterial enzymes, such as Escherichia coli xylose isomerase (XI) and arabinose isomerase (AI) which are essential for utilizing cellulosic sugars, cannot be functionally expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We hypothesized and demonstrated that the mismatching of the HSP60 chaperone systems between bacterial and eukaryotic cells might be the reason these bacterial enzymes cannot be functionally expressed in yeast. The results showed that the co-expression of E. coli GroE can facilitate the functional expression of E. coli XI and AI, as well as the Agrobacterium tumefaciens D-psicose epimerase in S. cerevisiae. The co-expression of bacterial chaperonins in S. cerevisiae is a promising post-translational strategy for the functional expression of bacterial enzymes in yeast. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available