4.6 Review

Microtubule-Asssociated Proteins: Structuring the Cytoskeleton

Journal

TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 804-819

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.07.004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Initiatives d'Excellence (IDEX)
  2. Laboratoire d'Excellence (LabEx) CelTisPhyBio [ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02, ANR-11-LBX-0038]
  3. Institut Curie
  4. ANR [ANR-17-CE13-0021]
  5. Institut National du Cancer (INCA) [2014-PL BIO-11-ICR-1]
  6. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM) [DEQ20170336756]
  7. FRM [FDT201904008210, FDT201805005465]
  8. EU [675737]
  9. Evaluacion y Orientacion de la Cooperacion Cientifica -Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ECOS-CONICYT) [C14B01]
  10. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (FONDECYT) [15150012]
  11. Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigacion en Areas Prioritarias (FONDAP) [15150012]
  12. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE13-0021] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) were initially discovered as proteins that bind to and stabilize microtubules. Today, an ever-growing number of MAPs reveals a more complex picture of these proteins as organizers of the microtubule cytoskeleton that have a large variety of functions. MAPs enable microtubules to participate in a plethora of cellular processes such as the assembly of mitotic and meiotic spindles, neuronal development, and the formation of the ciliary axoneme. Although some subgroups of MAPs have been exhaustively characterized, a strikingly large number of MAPs remain barely characterized other than their interactions with microtubules. We provide a comprehensive view on the currently known MAPs in mammals. We discuss their molecular mechanisms and functions, as well as their physiological role and links to pathologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available