4.3 Review

Eculizumab and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of Complement Therapeutics

Journal

TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 256-265

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.09.004

Keywords

Complement; Eculizumab; Ravulizumab; Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria; Autoimmune hemolytic anemia; Thrombotic microangiopathy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dysregulation of the complement system underlies the pathophysiology of many diseases. Renewed interest in complement occurred with the recognition that its therapeutic inhibition was possible. Terminal complement blockade with the anti-C5 monoclonal antibody eculizumab significantly changed management and clinical outcomes of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and served as a proof of concept for other complement-mediated diseases. Eculizumab is also approved for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and myasthenia gravis. Multiple new disease indications have been identified, and novel complement inhibitors are in various stages of development, with several currently in human trials. Beyond C5, these new drugs block proximal complement, pathway-specific targets, convertase activity, and anaphylatoxin function. Though monoclonal antibodies are still common, peptides, RNAi, and small molecule inhibitors provide the opportunity for different administration routes and schedules. Several challenges still exist or will soon present themselves, including mitigation of infection risk, effective monitoring strategies, and how to choose between therapeutics when more than one is available. In this review, we will describe the lessons learned from the eculizumab era, present many of the novel therapeutics currently or soon to be in trials, and highlight some of the challenges that will require attention as the field progresses. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available