4.7 Article

Numerical prediction for effects of fiber orientation on perforation resistance behaviors of patch-repaired composite panel subjected to projectile impact

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106325

Keywords

Perforation resistance; Repaired composite; Projectile impact; Fiber orientation; Energy absorption

Funding

  1. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621004]
  2. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate [CX2018B204]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11402011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To improve the resistance capacity of repaired composite structures, effects of fiber orientation on perforation mechanisms of bonding- and scarf-patch repaired panel under impact loading are predicted. To this end, the linear-exponential intraply damage model and bi-linear interface debonding damage model are adopted to capture various damage modes occurring both in composite patch and laminate. The adopted damage model is validated with available experimental data. Then, the perforation resistance mechanisms of repaired panel with different fiber orientations are predicted and analyzed. Four types of layups including [0](3)+[theta](4), [theta](3)+[theta /90-](2), [theta](3)+[0](4) and [theta](3)+[theta](4) ([...](3)+[...](4) represents '[laminate](3)+[patch](4)') are considered. Results show that numerical residual velocity, energy absorption and damage modes corresponding to three impact locations respectively agree well with experimental results. Through numerical analysis for proposed layups, significant insights into perforation resistance mechanism, energy dissipation mechanism and stress distribution law are gained. Conclusions drawn from such predictions contribute to layup design of repaired aircraft panel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available