4.8 Article

Characterization of a microfluidic microbial fuel cell as a power generator based on a nickel electrode

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 327-333

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.12.022

Keywords

Microfluidic microbial fuel cell; Nickel electrode; Escherichia coli; Glucose

Funding

  1. Sharif University of Technology, Vice President for Research Grant [G930111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the fabrication of a microfluidic microbial fuel cell (MFC) using nickel as a novel alternative for conventional electrodes and a non-phatogenic strain of Escherichia coli as the biocatalyst. The feasibility of a microfluidic MFC as an efficient power generator for production of bioelectricity from glucose and urea as organic substrates in human blood and urine for implantable medical devices (IMDs) was investigated. A maximum open circuit potential of 459 mV was achieved for the batch-fed micro fluidic MFC. During continuous mode operation, a maximum power density of 104 W m(-3) was obtained with nutrient broth. For the glucose-fed microfluidic MFC, the maximum power density of 5.2 mu W cm(-2) obtained in this study is significantly greater than the power densities reported previously for microsized MFCs and glucose fuel cells. The maximum power density of 14 W m(-3) obtained using urea indicates the successful performance of a microfluidic MFC using human excreta. It features high power density, self regeneration, waste management and a low production cost ( <$1), which suggest it as a promising alternative to conventional power supplies for IMDs. The performance of the microfluidic MFC as a power supply was characterized based on polarization behavior and cell potential in different substrates, operational modes, and concentrations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available