4.8 Review

Hierarchical Structure of Silk Materials Versus Mechanical Performance and Mesoscopic Engineering Principles

Journal

SMALL
Volume 15, Issue 51, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201903948

Keywords

hierarchical structure; mechanical performance; mesoscopic engineering; nucleation model; silk fibroin materials

Funding

  1. NUS AcRF Tier 1 [R-144-000-416-114]
  2. 111 project [B16029]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation [U1405226]
  4. Doctoral Fund of the Ministry of Education [20130121110018]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612133]
  6. 1000 Talents Program from the Xiamen University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comprehensive review on the five levels of hierarchical structures of silk materials and the correlation with macroscopic properties/performance of the silk materials, that is, the toughness, strain-stiffening, etc., is presented. It follows that the crystalline binding force turns out to be very important in the stabilization of silk materials, while the beta-crystallite networks or nanofibrils and the interactions among helical nanofibrils are two of the most essential structural elements, which to a large extent determine the macroscopic performance of various forms of silk materials. In this context, the characteristic structural factors such as the orientation, size, and density of beta-crystallites are very crucial. It is revealed that the formation of these structural elements is mainly controlled by the intermolecular nucleation of beta-crystallites. Consequently, the rational design and reconstruction of silk materials can be implemented by controlling the molecular nucleation via applying sheering force and seeding (i.e., with carbon nanotubes). In general, the knowledge of the correlation between hierarchical structures and performance provides an understanding of the structural reasons behind the fascinating behaviors of silk materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available