4.6 Article

Preliminary study of the association of serum irisin levels with poor sleep quality in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 71-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.10.021

Keywords

Irisin; Rheumatoid arthritis; Sleep; Disease activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objectives: Sleep disorders are significant problems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are associated with poor quality of life. Irisin is myokine which may have anti-inflammatory and energy regulatory roles. This study assessed the association of serum irisin levels with the quality of sleep and disease activity in RA patients. Methods: In sum, 58 RA patients and 30 matched healthy controls were included. Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28-ESR) and the patients' global score were calculated. RA patients were grouped according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score (PSQI) into good-sleepers (group 1) defined as a PQSI score >= 5 and poor sleepers (group 2) with a PSQI > 5. Serum irisin levels were measured for both patients and controls by commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Results: Poor sleep quality was found in 26 (45%) of the RA patients. Irisin levels were significantly lower in RA patients with poor sleep compared to those with good sleep and healthy controls (p < 0.001). Serum irisin levels correlated inversely with disease duration, morning stiffness duration, DAS28-ESR, global score, and total PSQI score (r = -0.722 to -0.263 & p values <= 0.001-0.04) indicating a possible anti-inflammatory role of irisin in RA patients. The analysis employed Student's t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation. Conclusions: Irisin levels were decreased in RA patients with poor sleep quality compared to RA patients with good sleep quality and healthy controls, indicating a possible association of decreased serum irisin with sleep impairment in RA patients. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available