4.7 Article

Improving wastewater treatment capacity by optimizing hydraulic retention time of dual-anode assembled microbial desalination cell system

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 39-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.071

Keywords

Microbial desalination cell; Wastewater treatment; Hydraulic retention time; Microbial community structure

Funding

  1. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups [21521064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, two dual-anode assembled microbial desalination cells (DA-MDCs) composed of two anodes, one cathode and two membrane stacks were constructed, with a hollow fiber membrane (HFM) module coupling into the cathode to filtrate suspended solids and microbes. Enriched domestic wastewater treatment performance of the DA-MDC system under different hydraulic retention time (HRT) was investigated in detail. When HRT sequentially decreased from 10 h, 8 h, 6 h to 4 h, the conductivity in diluent effluent kept stable at first, but increased 519% at 4 h compared with 6 h. Nevertheless, the chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen and total phosphorus in the effluent met the wastewater discharge standards in China at all HRTs. Additionally, trans membrane pressure of the HFM modules increased sharply when HRT changed from 6 h to 4 h. Therefore, HRT 6 h was selected as the optimal condition. Under such short HRT, the system realized wastewater treatment capacity of 10 L/d, surpassing all bio-cathode microbial desalination cell systems aiming to realize efficient treatment of domestic wastewater. Additionally, the salt removal rate of 0.215 g/h was more than two times compared with most similar systems. Finally, stratified microbial community structures in the cathodes of the system were found. This gave evidence on the efficient catholyte recirculation which might facilitate nitrogen removal from wastewater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available