4.7 Article

An anti-HCT-interference glucose sensor based on a fiber paper-based screen-printed carbon electrode

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 297, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.126763

Keywords

Hematocrit; Screen-printed biosensor; High sensitivity; Paper-based

Funding

  1. fund of research institutes and colleges collaborative innovation [111800XX62]
  2. UCAS Young teacher research fund [Y55103NY00, Y55103EY00, Y65201FY00, Y25102TN00]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [Z160002]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences Key project foundation [KFZD-SW-202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the number of diabetic patients increases year by year, the demand for a self-monitoring blood glucose test also increases. Additionally, more in-depth studies of blood glucose biosensors have led to increasing accuracy requirements. However, at present, most enzyme glucose sensors have difficulty solving issues related to hematocrit (HCT) interference. Most studies on anti-HCT interference in blood glucose sensing have mainly focused on correction factors, such as glucose correction, and electrical impedance or resistivity characteristics to correct the impact of HCT. In this work, we developed an anti-HCT-interference blood glucose sensor based on a fiber paper-based screen-printed carbon electrode with a mediator (potassium ferricyanide) and glucose oxidase (GOD), which were fixed through inkjet printing. When testing whole blood samples with HCT levels of 20%-70% and a fluid dropping method, the results of a consensus error grid analysis showed that 91% of the data points lied within zones A and B. The glucose sensor was exclusively designed with a 16 mu L chamber in the working area of the sensor. When the testing fluid was taken in by capillary sucking, the effect of HCT was further reduced, and 95% of the data points lied within zones A and B in the consensus error grid.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available