4.0 Article

Environmental variability in response to abrupt climatic change during the Last Glacial-Interglacial Transition (16-8 cal ka BP): evidence from Mainland, Orkney

Journal

SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 30-46

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC PUBL HOUSE
DOI: 10.1144/sjg2019-006

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Environmental Research Council [NE/L002485/1]
  2. Royal Holloway University of London in the form of a Reid scholarship
  3. Quaternary Research Association (QRA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Last Glacial-Interglacial Transition (LGIT) is a period of climatic complexity where millennial-scale climatic reorganization led to changes in ecosystems. Alongside millennial-scale changes, centennial-scale climatic events have been observed within records from Greenland and continental Europe. The effects of these abrupt events on landscapes and environments are difficult to discern at present. This, in part, relates to low temporal resolutions attained by many studies and the sensitivity of palaeoenvironmental proxies to abrupt change. We present a high-resolution palynological and charcoal study of Quoyloo Meadow, Orkney and use the Principal Curve statistical method to assist in revealing biostratigraphic change. The LGIT vegetation succession on Orkney is presented as open grassland and Empetrum heath during the Windermere Interstadial and early Holocene, and open grassland with Artemisia during the Loch Lomond Stadial. However, a further three phases of ecological change, characterized by expansions of open ground flora, are dated to 14.05-13.63, 10.94-10.8 and 10.2 cal ka BP. The timing of these changes is constrained by cryptotephra of known age. The paper concludes by comparing Quoyloo Meadow with Crudale Meadow, Orkney, and suggests that both Windermere Interstadial records are incomplete and that fire is an important landscape control during the early Holocene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available