4.7 Article

Effects of soil- and climate data aggregation on simulated potato yield and irrigation water requirement

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 710, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135589

Keywords

Data resolution; Scale; Regional modelling; Data aggregation; Spatial heterogeneity; Model uncertainty

Funding

  1. Universities Australia
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) through the Australia-Germany Joint Research Co-operation Scheme
  3. Water for Profit program through the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment, Tasmanian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Input data aggregation affects crop model estimates at the regional level. Previous studies have focused on the impact of aggregating climate data used to compute crop yields. However, little is known about the combined data aggregation effect of climate (DAE(c)) and soil (DAE(S)) on irrigation water requirement (IWR) in cool-temperate and spatially heterogeneous environments. The aims of this study were to quantify DAE(c) and DAE(s) of model input data and their combined impacts for simulated irrigated and rainfed yield and IWR. The Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator Next Generation model was applied for the period 1998-2017 across areas suitable for potato (Solarium luberosum L) in Tasmania, Australia, using data at 5, 15, 25 and 40 km resolution. Spatial variances of inputs and outputs were evaluated by the relative absolute difference (r (AD) over bar) between the aggregated grids and the 5 km grids. Climate data aggregation resulted in a r (AD) over bar of 0.7-12.1%, with high values especially for areas with pronounced differences in elevation. The r (AD) over bar of soil data was higher (5.6-26.3%) than r (AD) over bar of climate data and was mainly affected by aggregation of organic carbon and maximum plant available water capacity (i.e. the difference between held capacity and wilting point in the effective root zone). For yield estimates, the difference among resolutions (5 km vs. 40 km) was more pronounced for rainfed (r (AD) over bar - 14.5%) than irrigated conditions (r (AD) over bar - 3.0%). The r (AD) over bar of IWR was 15.7% when using input data at 40 km resolution. Therefore, reliable simulations of rainfed yield require a higher spatial resolution than simulation of irrigated yields. This needs to be considered when conducting regional modelling studies across Tasmania. This study also highlights the need to separately quantify the impact of input data aggregation on model outputs to inform about data aggregation errors and identify those variables that explain these errors. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available