4.8 Article

Electrocatalytic determination of nitrite based on straw cellulose/molybdenum sulfide nanocomposite

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages 692-697

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.078

Keywords

Straw; Cellulose; TEMPO; Molybdenum Sulfide; Nitrite

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21307104]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20130438, BK20150451]
  3. Scientific and Technological Innovation Foster Foundation of Yangzhou University [2015CXJ035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellulose is the most abundant, renewable, biodegradable natural polymer resource on earth, which can be a good substrate for catalysis. In this work, straw cellulose has been oxidized through 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical (TEMPO)-mediated oxidation, and then a TEMPO oxidized straw cellulose/molybdenum sulfide (TOSC-MoS2) composite has been synthesized via a hydrothermal method. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis confirm that TOSC and MoS2 have successfully composited. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images show the TOSC as a carbon nanotube-like structure and edged MoS2 grows on the TOSC substrate. The TOSC-MoS2 modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) is used as a simple and non enzymatic electrochemical sensor. Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) result shows TOSC-MoS2 has excellent electrocatalytic activity for the oxidation of nitrite. The amperometric response result indicates the TOSC-MoS2 modified GCE can be used to determine nitrite concentration in wide linear ranges of 6.0-3140 and 3140-4200 mu M with a detection limit of 2.0 mu M. The proposed sensor has good anti-interference property. Real sample analysis and the electrocatalytic mechanism have also been presented. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available