4.8 Article

MAIT cells are imprinted by the microbiota in early life and promote tissue repair

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 366, Issue 6464, Pages 445-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aax6624

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of NIAID, NIH [ZIA-AI001115, ZIA-AI001132]
  2. NIH Extramural Research Program [U19-AI111143, R01-DK110174, DP1-DK113598, DP2-AI144968]
  3. Cancer Research Institute Irvington Postdoctoral Fellowship Program
  4. European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) Long-Term Fellowship Program
  5. ARC Foundation
  6. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) Postdoctoral Research Associate Training (PRAT) Program
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Hanna H. Gray Fellows Program
  8. HHMI-Simons Faculty Scholars Program
  9. Chan Zuckerberg Biohub
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI001115, ZIAAI001132] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How early-life colonization and subsequent exposure to the microbiota affect long-term tissue immunity remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the development of mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells relies on a specific temporal window, after which MAIT cell development is permanently impaired. This imprinting depends on early-life exposure to defined microbes that synthesize riboflavin-derived antigens. In adults, cutaneous MAIT cells are a dominant population of interleukin-17A (IL-17A)-producing lymphocytes, which display a distinct transcriptional signature and can subsequently respond to skin commensals in an IL-1-, IL-18-, and antigen-dependent manner. Consequently, local activation of cutaneous MAIT cells promotes wound healing. Together, our work uncovers a privileged interaction between defined members of the microbiota and MAIT cells, which sequentially controls both tissue-imprinting and subsequent responses to injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available