4.8 Article

Global distribution of earthworm diversity

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 366, Issue 6464, Pages 480-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aax4851

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. sDiv [Synthesis Centre of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig] [DFG FZT 118]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [677232]
  3. ERC-ADV grant [323020]
  4. iDiv Flexpool [DFG FZT118, 34600850]
  5. Academy of Finland [285882]
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2019-05758]
  7. DOB Ecology
  8. TULIP Laboratory of Excellence [ANR-10-LABX-41]
  9. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [12-04-01538-a, 12-04-01734-a, 14-44-03666-r_center_a, 15-29-02724-ofi_m, 16-0401878-a 19-05-00245]
  10. Tarbiat Modares University
  11. Aurora Organic Dairy
  12. UGC(NERO) [F. 1-6/Acctt./NERO/2007-08/1485]
  13. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN-2017-05391]
  14. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0098-12]
  15. Science for Global Development through Wageningen University
  16. Norman Borlaug LEAP Programme
  17. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
  18. Sao Paulo Research Foundation -FAPESP [12/22510-8]
  19. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station
  20. INIA -Spanish Agency [SUM 2006-00012-00-0]
  21. Royal Canadian Geographical Society
  22. Environmental Protection Agency (Ireland) [2005-S-LS-8]
  23. University of Hawai`i at Manoa [HAW01127H, HAW01123M]
  24. European Union FP7 (FunDivEurope) [265171]
  25. U.S. Department of the Navy, Commander Pacific Fleet [W9126G-13-2-0047]
  26. Science and Engineering Research Board Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India [SB/SO/AS-030/2013]
  27. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) of the U.S. Department of Defense [RC-1542]
  28. Maranhao State Research Foundation (FAPEMA)
  29. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
  30. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LTT17033]
  31. Colorado Wheat Research Foundation
  32. Zone Atelier Alpes, French National Research Agency [ANR-11-BSV7020-01, ANR-09-STRA-02-01, ANR 06 BIODIV 009-01]
  33. Austrian Science Fund [P16027, T441]
  34. Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank Frankfurt am Main
  35. Welsh Government
  36. European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development [A AAB 62 03 qA731606]
  37. SEPAQ
  38. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland
  39. Science Foundation Ireland [EEB0061]
  40. University of Toronto (Faculty of Forestry)
  41. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  42. Haliburton Forest and Wildlife Reserve
  43. NKU College of Arts and Sciences Grant
  44. Osterreichische Forschungsforderungsgesellschaft [837393, 837426]
  45. Mountain Agriculture Research Unit of the University of Innsbruck
  46. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan
  47. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala
  48. UNEP/GEF/TSBF-CIAT Project on Conservation and Sustainable Management of Belowground Biodiversity
  49. Complutense University of Madrid/European Union FP7 project BioBio [FPU UCM 613520]
  50. GRDC
  51. AWI
  52. LWRRDC
  53. DRDC
  54. CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council)
  55. FONCyT (National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion)
  56. Universidad Nacional de Lujan
  57. FONCyT [PICT 2293 (2006)]
  58. Fonds de recherche sur la nature et les technologies du Quebec [131894]
  59. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SCHR1000/3-1, SCHR1000/6-1, SCHR1000/6-2 (FOR 1598), WO 670/7-1, WO 670/7-2, SCHA 1719/1-2]
  60. CONACYT [FONDOS MIXTOS TABASCO/PROYECTO11316]
  61. Institute for Environmental Science and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago
  62. Dean's Scholar Program at UIC
  63. Garden Club of America Zone VI Fellowship in Urban Forestry from the Casey Tree Endowment Fund
  64. J. E. Weaver Competitive Grant from the Nebraska Chapter of The Nature Conservancy
  65. College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at DePaul University
  66. Elmore Hadley Award for Research in Ecology and Evolution from the UIC Dept. of Biological Sciences
  67. Spanish CICYT [AMB96-1161, REN2000-0783/GLO, REN2003-05553/GLO, REN2003-03989/GLO, CGL2007-60661/BOS]
  68. Yokohama National University
  69. MEXT KAKENHI [25220104]
  70. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [25281053, 17KT0074, 25252026]
  71. ADEME [0775C0035]
  72. Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities of Spain [CGL2017-86926-P]
  73. Syngenta Philippines
  74. UPSTREAM
  75. LTSER (Val Mazia/Matschertal)
  76. Marie Sklodowska Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship [747607]
  77. National Science and Technology Base Resource Survey Project of China [2018FY100306]
  78. McKnight Foundation [14-168]
  79. Program of Fundamental Researches of Presidium of Russian Academy of Sciences [AAAA-A18-118021490070-5]
  80. Brazilian National Council of Research CNPq
  81. French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs
  82. NIH [DGE-0549245, DEB-BE-0909452 NSF1241932]
  83. [ERC-AdG 694368]
  84. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [T441, P16027] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  85. European Research Council (ERC) [323020] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  86. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17KT0074] Funding Source: KAKEN
  87. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [747607] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  88. Academy of Finland (AKA) [285882, 285882] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil organisms, including earthworms, are a key component of terrestrial ecosystems. However, little is known about their diversity, their distribution, and the threats affecting them. We compiled a global dataset of sampled earthworm communities from 6928 sites in 57 countries as a basis for predicting patterns in earthworm diversity, abundance, and biomass. We found that local species richness and abundance typically peaked at higher latitudes, displaying patterns opposite to those observed in aboveground organisms. However, high species dissimilarity across tropical locations may cause diversity across the entirety of the tropics to be higher than elsewhere. Climate variables were found to be more important in shaping earthworm communities than soil properties or habitat cover. These findings suggest that climate change may have serious implications for earthworm communities and for the functions they provide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available