4.7 Article

Patient-reported outcomes in RA care improve patient communication, decision-making, satisfaction and confidence: qualitative results

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 7, Pages 1662-1670

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez506

Keywords

patient-reported outcomes; rheumatoid arthritis; PROMIS; qualitative research; clinical practice

Categories

Funding

  1. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) [IP2-PI000737]
  2. Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Award [EAIN-1988]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Rheumatic Diseases Resource-based Core Center [P30-AR053503, P30-AR070254]
  4. Ira Fine Discovery Fund
  5. Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center Discovery Fund
  6. Camille J. Morgan Arthritis Research and Education Fund
  7. Scheer Family Foundation
  8. Rheumatology Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To evaluate the impact of integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into routine clinics, from the perspective of patients with RA, clinicians and other staff. Methods. We conducted a prospective cohort study using a mixed methods sequential explanatory design at an academic arthritis clinic. RA patients completed selected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures on tablets in the waiting room. Results were immediately available to discuss during the visit. Post-visit surveys with patients and physicians evaluated topics discussed and their impact on decision making; patients rated confidence in treatment. Focus groups or interviews with patients, treating rheumatologists and clinic staff were conducted to understand perspectives and experiences. Results. Some 196 patients and 20 rheumatologists completed post-visit surveys at 816 and 806 visits, respectively. Focus groups were conducted with 24 patients, 10 rheumatologists and 4 research/clinic staff. PROs influenced medical decision-making and RA treatment changes (38 and 18% of visits, respectively). Patients reported very high satisfaction and treatment confidence. Impact on clinical workflow was minimal after a period of initial adjustment. PROs were valued by patients and physicians, and provided new insight into how patients felt and functioned over time. Reviewing results together improved communication, and facilitated patient-centred care, shared decision making, and the identification of new symptoms and contributing psychosocial/behavioural factors. Conclusion. PRO use at RA visits was feasible, increased understanding of how disease affects how patients feel and function, facilitated shared decision-making, and was associated with high patient satisfaction and treatment confidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available