4.7 Article

Environmental sustainability of small-scale biomass power technologies for agricultural communities in developing countries

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 493-506

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.036

Keywords

Biomass electricity; Rural electrification; Agricultural waste; Gasification; Anaerobic digestion; Combustion; Life cycle assessment (LCA)

Funding

  1. UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
  2. Philippine Commission on Higher Education [261718262]
  3. U1(Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)) [EP/K011820/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/K011820/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agricultural wastes are readily available in farming communities and can be utilised for off-grid electrification as an alternative to diesel generators. This work evaluates for the first time the life cycle environmental sustainability of these small-scale systems in the context of Southeast Asia. Rice and coconut residues are considered for direct combustion and gasification, and livestock manure for anaerobic digestion. Overall, anaerobic digestion is the best option for 14 out of 18 impacts estimated through life cycle assessment. The results also suggest that gasification has up to 12 times lower impacts per kWh than combustion, except for resource depletion. Combustion and gasification have 85% to two times lower impacts than diesel generators, except for eutrophication, ecotoxicity and human toxicity. Depending on the feedstock, global warming potential of anaerobic digestion ranges from being 170% lower to 41% higher than that of the diesel generator. Overall, providing power from residual biomass in small agricultural communities would reduce environmental impacts significantly while improving waste management practices. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available