4.8 Review

A review of waste heat recovery from the marine engine with highly efficient bottoming power cycles

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109611

Keywords

Marine engine; Waste heat recovery; Bottoming power cycles; Off-design performance; Technoeconomic evaluation; System integration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809166]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims at presenting an extensive review of waste heat recovery (WHR) from the marine engine with highly efficient bottoming power cycles which include the steam Rankine cycle, organic Rankine cycle, Kalina cycle and CO2-based power cycles. After detailed introductions and comparisons of the bottoming power cycles, the design and selection of system components are reviewed. An in-depth survey of the WHR systems operating under off-design conditions is then conducted, followed by a summary of technoeconomic evaluation. Finally, challenges and opportunities of integrating the WHR systems with other emission reduction technologies are discussed. According to the literature, trade-offs between working fluid characteristics, cycle configuration, size, cost and WHR potential should be made in designing an optimal bottoming power cycle, and fuel savings ranging from 4% to 15% can be expected. The payback time of installing a bottoming WHR system lies typically in the range from 3 to 8 years, depending on the fuel price, ship type, heat and power demands and component costs. The high-pressure exhaust gas recirculation technology is superior to other NOx reduction technologies due to its high potential of recovering waste heat from the high-temperature recirculated gas. Ship's operational profiles, engine tuning and slow steaming as well as other emission reduction technologies are recommended to be fully considered for future research on WHR systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available