4.8 Article

A deep learning algorithm to estimate hourly global solar radiation from geostationary satellite data

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109327

Keywords

Global solar radiation; Convolutional neural network; Deep learning; Geostationary satellite; Temporal and spatial variations

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41890854]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To apply deep learning technique for estimating hourly global solar radiation (GSR) from geostationary satellite observations, a hybrid deep network is proposed, relying on convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract spatial pattern from satellite imagery, multi-layer perceptron (MLP) to link the abstract patterns and additional time/location information to target hourly GSR. Its representative advantage lies in the ability to characterize changeable cloud morphology and simulate complex non-linear relationships. The deep network is trained using ground measured GSR values at 90 Chinese radiation stations in 2008 as well as the radiative transfer model simulation at the top of Mt. Everest which serves as constraints of extrapolation for high elevation regions. The extensibility of trained network is validated at 5 independent stations in 2008, yielding an overall coefficient of determination (R-2) of 0.82, and at all stations in 2007 along with an R-2 of 0.88. Comparative experiments confirm that the combination of spatial pattern and point information can lead to more accurate estimation of hourly GSR, achieving a minimum root mean square error (RMSE) of 84.18 W/m(2) (0.30 MJ/m(2)), 1.92 MJ/m(2) and 1.08 MJ/m(2) in hourly, daily total and monthly total scales, respectively. Moreover, the deep network is capable of mapping spatially continuous hourly GSR which reflects the regional differences and reproduce the diurnal cycles of solar radiation properly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available