4.4 Article

A novel caged Cookson-type reagent toward a practical vitamin D derivatization method for mass spectrometric analyses

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8648

Keywords

Cookson; vitamin D; clinical laboratory; mass spectrometry; derivatization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale 25-Hydroxylated vitamin D is the best marker for vitamin D (VD). Due to its low ionization efficiency, a Cookson-type reagent, 1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (TAD), is used to improve the detection/quantification of VD metabolites by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). However, the high reactivity of TAD makes its solution stability low and inconvenient for practical use. We here describe the development of a novel caged Cookson-type reagent, and we assess its performances in the quantitative and differential detection of four VD metabolites in serum using LC/MS/MS. Methods Caged 4-(4 '-dimethylaminophenyl)-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (DAPTAD) analogues were prepared from 4-(4 '-dimethylaminophenyl)-1,2,4-triazolidine-3,5-dione. Their stability and reactivity were examined. The optimized caged DAPTAD (14-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-9-phenyl-9,10-dihydro-9,10-[1,2]epitriazoloanthracene-13,15-dione, DAP-PA) was used for LC/MS/MS analyses of VD metabolites. Results The solution stability of DAP-PA in ethyl acetate dramatically improved compared with that of the non-caged one. We measured the thermal retro-Diels-Alder reaction enabling the release of DAPTAD and found that the derivatization reaction was temperature-dependent. We also determined the detection limit and the lower limit of quantifications for four VD metabolites with DAPTAD derivatization. Conclusions DAP-PA was stable enough for mid- to long-term storage in solution. This advantage shall contribute to the detection and quantification of VD in clinical laboratories, and as such to the broader use of clinical mass spectrometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available