4.7 Article

The revised Green et al., Paranoid Thoughts Scale (R-GPTS): psychometric properties, severity ranges, and clinical cut-offs

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 244-253

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719003155

Keywords

Assessment; delusions; paranoia

Funding

  1. NIHR Research Professorship [NIHR-RP-2014-05-003]
  2. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme (WIT project) - UK Medical Research Council (MRC) [09/160/06]
  3. Medical Research Council Developmental Pathway Funding Scheme (Immersive Virtual Reality Cognitive Treatment (VRCT) for persecutory delusions) [MR/P02629X/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust (University of Oxford Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute) [098461/Z/12/Z]
  5. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) [G0902308]
  6. NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre
  7. MRC [MR/P02629X/1, MC_PC_11007, G0902308] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that the Green et al., Paranoid Thoughts Scale (GPTS) needed improvement, and the revised R-GPTS is a more precise tool recommended for future studies on paranoia.
Background The Green et al., Paranoid Thoughts Scale (GPTS) - comprising two 16-item scales assessing ideas of reference (Part A) and ideas of persecution (Part B) - was developed over a decade ago. Our aim was to conduct the first large-scale psychometric evaluation. Methods In total, 10 551 individuals provided GPTS data. Four hundred and twenty-two patients with psychosis and 805 non-clinical individuals completed GPTS Parts A and B. An additional 1743 patients with psychosis and 7581 non-clinical individuals completed GPTS Part B. Factor analysis, item response theory, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were conducted. Results The original two-factor structure of the GPTS had an inadequate model fit: Part A did not form a unidimensional scale and multiple items were locally dependant. A Revised-GPTS (R-GPTS) was formed, comprising eight-item ideas of reference and 10-item ideas of persecution subscales, which had an excellent model fit. All items in the new Reference (a = 2.09-3.67) and Persecution (a = 2.37-4.38) scales were strongly discriminative of shifts in paranoia and had high reliability across the spectrum of severity (a > 0.90). The R-GPTS score ranges are: average (Reference: 0-9; Persecution: 0-4); elevated (Reference: 10-15; Persecution: 5-10); moderately severe (Reference: 16-20; Persecution:11-17); severe (Reference: 21-24; Persecution: 18-27); and very severe (Reference: 25+; Persecution: 28+). Recommended cut-offs on the persecution scale are 11 to discriminate clinical levels of persecutory ideation and 18 for a likely persecutory delusion. Conclusions The psychometric evaluation indicated a need to improve the GPTS. The R-GPTS is a more precise measure, has excellent psychometric properties, and is recommended for future studies of paranoia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available