4.7 Review

Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112679

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder; Prevalence; Meta-analysis; Asia

Categories

Funding

  1. Graduate Innovation Fund of Jilin University [101832018C064]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201806170230]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2018YFC1311600, 2015DFA31580]
  4. Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province [20150101130JC]
  5. Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Neuronal Plasticity [20140622001JC, 20160622020JC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There has been an increased prevalence of the diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) globally during the last decade. An updated and overall estimate of ASD prevalence in Asia would assist health professionals to develop relevant public health strategies. We performed a systematic review by searching English databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochran Library) from inception date to August 6, 2018. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were performed to address heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test. A total of 2,195,497 subjects in Asia from 12 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of ASD prevalence among the included subjects was 0.36% (95% CI: 0.16-0.79%). The pooled ASD prevalence in males (0.45%, 95% CI: 0.19-1.04%) was higher than that in females (0.18%, 95% CI: 0.079-0.49%). ASD prevalence in East Asia, South Asia, and West Asia was 0.51% (95% CI: 0.06-4.22%), 0.31% (95% CI: 0.14-0.65%), and 0.35% (95% CI: 0.07-1.80%) respectively. The prevalence of ASD is increasing in Asia. Universal and standardized diagnostic processes for ASD should be adopted for the prevention and control programs of ASD in future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available