4.7 Article

Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting

Journal

BIOSCIENCE
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages 489-498

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biw038

Keywords

biodiversity offsets; conservation policy; environmental ethics; environmental governance; no net loss

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Government's National Environmental Science Program's Threatened Species Recovery Hub
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [FT140100516]
  3. Australian Postgraduate Award
  4. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Climate Adaptation Flagship scholarship
  5. ARC [DP150103122]
  6. ARC Centre for Excellence for Environmental Decisions Top-Up Scholarship
  7. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship award from the European Commission
  8. Australian Research Council [FT140100516] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rising popularity of biodiversity offsetting as a tool for balancing biodiversity losses from development with equivalent gains elsewhere has sparked debate on many fronts. The fundamental questions are the following: Is offsetting good, bad, or at least better than the status quo for biodiversity conservation outcomes, and what do we need to know to decide? We present a concise synthesis of the most contentious issues related to biodiversity offsetting, categorized as ethical, social, technical, or governance challenges. In each case, we discuss avenues for reducing disagreement over these issues and identify those that are likely to remain unresolved. We argue that there are many risks associated with the unscrutinized expansion of offset policy. Nevertheless, governments are increasingly adopting offset policies, so working rapidly to clarify and-where possible-to resolve these issues is essential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available