4.7 Article

Inerting effects of ammonium polyphosphate on explosion characteristics of polypropylene dust

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 221-230

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.015

Keywords

Ammonium polyphosphate; Polypropylene; Inerting effect; Minimum inerting concentration; Thermal analysis

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan [2018YFC0800102]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [2143 6006]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [18KJB620002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study experimentally investigated that the inerting effect of Ammonium Polyphosphate (APP) on characteristics of Polypropylene (PP) dust explosion. The results indicated that the maximum explosion pressure (P-max), the explosion index (K-st) and the minimum explosion concentration (MEC) of PP powders were 8 bar, 257 bar m/s and 25 g/m(3), respectively. Moreover, the minimum ignition energy (MIE) and the minimum ignition temperature (MIT) were 10 mJ and 335 degrees C, correspondingly for PP dust cloud. The explosion of PP powders could be inerted completely by 80 wt% APP. In addition, the MIE of PP powders increased when the mass fraction of APP increased. Furthermore, APP had a significant inerting effect on the MIT of PP dust cloud. The MIT of PP powders increased by 80 degrees C when the mass fraction of APP increased to 80 wt %. Thermal analysis results showed that the introduction of APP could improve the thermal stability of PP. Furthermore, thermogravimetric analysis/infrared (TG-IR) spectroscopy was employed to gain insights into the pyrolysis mechanism of the PP/APP mixtures. The TG-IR results showed that the volatilized products formed in the pyrolysis were H2O and NH3 which could dilute and consume oxygen in gas phase. (C) 2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available