4.7 Article

A study on the FTIR spectra of pre- and post-explosion coal dust to evaluate the effect of functional groups on dust explosion

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 48-56

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.07.018

Keywords

Coal dust; Explosion residues; FTIR spectra; Functional groups; Influence mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51174200]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015XKM5005]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of coal dust and its explosion solid residues were studied. Coal dust explosion test was carried out on a 20-L explosion device, and the variation of different functional groups and FTIR structural parameters of pre- and post-explosion dust were semi-quantitatively analyzed by deconvolution of the FTIR spectra. In addition, the relationship of explosion pressure (P-m) and pressure rise rate ((dP/dt)(m)) with functional groups was investigated. The results show that the largest consumption of functional groups in coal dust explosion process is distributed in 1800-1000 cm(-1) band, and most of the ether oxygen bond, methyl and benzene ring are removed from the coal macromolecule. The improved condensation degree of coal macromolecular aromatic ring and the decreased aliphatic side chains lead to a more compact coal molecular structure. The consumption of functional groups during coal dust explosion is positively correlated with the P-m and (dP/dt)(m). The research provides a new feasible method for the evaluation of the organic dust explosion risk by its functional group. Moreover, it can be used effectively as basis for suppressing the organic dust explosion. (C) 2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available