4.8 Article

Learning optimal decisions with confidence

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1906787116

Keywords

decision making; diffusion models; optimality; confidence

Funding

  1. James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award [220020462]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH115554]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_143707, 31003A_165831]
  4. Champalimaud Foundation
  5. European Research Council [250334, 671251]
  6. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0027/2010]
  7. Simons Foundation [325057]
  8. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [671251, 250334] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_165831, 31003A_143707] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion decision models (DDMs) are immensely successful models for decision making under uncertainty and time pressure. In the context of perceptual decision making, these models typically start with two input units, organized in a neuron-antineuron pair. In contrast, in the brain, sensory inputs are encoded through the activity of large neuronal populations. Moreover, while DDMs are wired by hand, the nervous system must learn the weights of the network through trial and error. There is currently no normative theory of learning in DDMs and therefore no theory of how decision makers could learn to make optimal decisions in this context. Here, we derive such a rule for learning a near-optimal linear combination of DDM inputs based on trial-by-trial feedback. The rule is Bayesian in the sense that it learns not only the mean of the weights but also the uncertainty around this mean in the form of a covariance matrix. In this rule, the rate of learning is proportional (respectively, inversely proportional) to confidence for incorrect (respectively, correct) decisions. Furthermore, we show that, in volatile environments, the rule predicts a bias toward repeating the same choice after correct decisions, with a bias strength that is modulated by the previous choice's difficulty. Finally, we extend our learning rule to cases for which one of the choices is more likely a priori, which provides insights into how such biases modulate the mechanisms leading to optimal decisions in diffusion models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available