4.4 Article

Heterochromatin Bands and rDNA Sites Evolution in Polyploidization Events in Cynodon Rich. (Poaceae)

Journal

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER
Volume 37, Issue 5-6, Pages 477-487

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11105-019-01173-2

Keywords

Chromosome evolution; Forage grass; Karyotype variation; Ploidy level

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) [00259-17]
  3. Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [88881.132585/2016-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cynodon is a genus with a wide distribution in tropical and subtropical areas. Ploidy levels in Cynodon range from diploid to hexaploid; hence, polyploidy is the most important driver of chromosome number variation in this genus. After polyploidization, structural rearrangements such as deletions, insertion, or duplications of DNA sequences frequently occur, allowing variation of chromosome morphology, size, and number. These events might result in a wide diversity of karyotypes, contributing to reproductive isolation, and consequently to speciation. In this study, we investigate the karyotype variation of Cynodon based on comparative cytogenetic analyses. We conducted chromosome counts, DNA quantification, CMA/DAPI double staining, and FISH mapping of 5S and 35S rDNA sites. Cytomolecular data were analyzed in a phylogenetic framework, in order to trace the evolutionary history of the karyotype variation considering polyploidy events in this group. Our results indicate that the most recent common ancestor of Cynodon had two 35S and 5S rDNA sites, two CMA bands, nine DAPI+ bands on the long arm, five DAPI+ bands on the short arm, and three DAPI+ bands in the pericentromeric region. During polyploidization events, there were losses and gains of heterochromatic sequences mainly on the short arms and centromeric regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available