4.8 Article

A Large Transposon Insertion in the stiff1 Promoter Increases Stalk Strength in Maize([OPEN])

Journal

PLANT CELL
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 152-165

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.19.00486

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0101803, 2016YFD0100303]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91735305, 31871632]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Downregulation of the maize F-box gene stiff1 by a transposon results in thicker stalk cell walls with increased cellulose and lignin, and thus improved stalk strength. Stalk lodging, which is generally determined by stalk strength, results in considerable yield loss and has become a primary threat to maize (Zea mays) yield under high-density planting. However, the molecular genetic basis of maize stalk strength remains unclear, and improvement methods remain inefficient. Here, we combined map-based cloning and association mapping and identified the gene stiff1 underlying a major quantitative trait locus for stalk strength in maize. A 27.2-kb transposable element insertion was present in the promoter of the stiff1 gene, which encodes an F-box domain protein. This transposable element insertion repressed the transcription of stiff1, leading to the increased cellulose and lignin contents in the cell wall and consequently greater stalk strength. Furthermore, a precisely edited allele of stiff1 generated through the CRISPR/Cas9 system resulted in plants with a stronger stalk than the unedited control. Nucleotide diversity analysis revealed that the promoter of stiff1 was under strong selection in the maize stiff-stalk group. Our cloning of stiff1 reveals a case in which a transposable element played an important role in maize improvement. The identification of stiff1 and our edited stiff1 allele pave the way for efficient improvement of maize stalk strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available