4.8 Article

Partial nitrification and denitrification of mature landfill leachate using a pilot-scale continuous activated sludge process at low dissolved oxygen

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages 580-588

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.008

Keywords

Mature landfill leachate; Nitrogen removal; Nitrite pathway; Low dissolved oxygen; Bacterial community analysis

Funding

  1. Specialized Applied Technology Research and Development (major) of Guangdong Province [2015B020235013]
  2. Guangdong Province Social Development Research Project of Science and Technology Department of Guangdong Province [2013B021000007]
  3. Comprehensively Cooperative and Competitive Assigned Project of Chinese Academy of Science in Guangdong Province [2013B091500028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controlling of low dissolved oxygen (DO) levels (0.1-0.5 mg/L), a cost-effective strategy, was applied to a pilot-scale anoxic-oxic-oxic-anoxic process for partial nitrification and denitrification of mature landfill leachate. High ammonium removal efficiency, stable nitrite accumulation rate and total nitrogen removal efficiency was higher than 95.0%, 90.0% and 66.4%, respectively, implying potential application of this process for nitrogen removal of mature landfill leachate. Efficient nitrite accumulation in the first oxic reactor depended on low DO conditions and sufficient alkalinity. However, operational limit was mainly decided by actual hydraulic retention time (AHRT) of the first oxic reactor and appeared with AHRT less than 13.9 h under DO of 0.3-0.5 mg/L. High-throughput sequencing analysis demonstrated significant change of bacterial diversity in the first oxic reactor after a long-term operation and dominant bacteria genus Nitrosomonas was shown to be responsible for NH4+-N removal and nitrite accumulation under low DO levels. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available