4.7 Article

Fungal volatile organic compounds show promise as potent molluscicides

Journal

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 75, Issue 12, Pages 3392-3404

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.5578

Keywords

slugs; snails; fungal volatiles; Metarhizium; repellents; molluscicides

Funding

  1. BBSRC NPRONET grant [BIV021]
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/R511614/1]
  3. Certis Europe BV
  4. BBSRC [BB/L012472/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Slugs and snails constitute major crop pests. Withdrawal of metaldehyde has prompted a search for more environmentally friendly yet fast acting molluscicides. This study investigated the response of representative molluscs to conidia and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of the insect pathogenic fungus Metarhizium brunneum Petch. RESULTS Conidia of M. brunneum had antifeedant/repellent properties with repellency being dependent upon the fungal strain and conidia concentration. Three commonly produced fungal VOCs, 1-octene, 3-octanone and 1-octen-3-ol, were repellent at low doses (1-5 mu L) but could kill slugs and snails on contact or fumigation. At the highest dose tested (10 mu L), 100% mortality was achieved for Cornu aspersum Muller (garden snail) and Derocerus reticulatum Muller (grey field slug) within 1 h post-treatment with the first deaths being recorded in <11 min. Aqueous formulations (20% v/v) of the most potent VOCs, 3-octanone and 1-octen-3-ol, could be sprayed onto plants to kill or drive the pest of the crop with no phytotoxic effects. CONCLUSION The sensitivity of terrestrial molluscs to 3-octanone and 1-octen-3-ol and the ephemeral nature of these compounds makes these excellent candidates for development as mollusc repellents or molluscicides. (c) 2019 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available