4.3 Article

Screening for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and prediabetes: Evaluating 1,5-anhydroglucitol, fructosamine, glycated albumin, and hemoglobin A1c

Journal

PEDIATRIC DIABETES
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 1080-1086

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12914

Keywords

1; 5-anhydroglucitol; cystic fibrosis-related diabetes; fructosamine; glycated albumin; hemoglobin A1c

Funding

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics [CHAN16A0, CHAN16GE0]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK094712-04, T32DK063687, UL1 TR 000154, UL1 TR 001082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Dysglycemia is prevalent in cystic fibrosis (CF) but screening with annual oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) can be burdensome. We investigated alternate glycemic markers-hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5AG), fructosamine (FA), and glycated albumin (GA)-as screening tests for CF-related diabetes (CFRD) and pre-diabetes (CFPD) in youth with CF as defined by the gold-standard OGTT 2-hour glucose (2hG). Methods Youth 10 to 18 years with CF had a 1,5AG, FA, GA, HbA1c, and 2-hour OGTT collected. Correlations between all glycemic markers and 2hG were evaluated. Area under the receiver operative characteristic (ROC-AUC) curves were generated. Optimal cut points for predicting CFPD (2hG >= 140 mg/dL) and CFRD (2hG >= 200 mg/dL) were determined. Results Fifty-eight youth with CF were included (2hG < 140, n = 16; CFPD, n = 33; CFRD, n = 9; 41% male, mean +/- SD age 14.2 +/- 3.6 years, BMI z-score 0.0 +/- 0.8, % predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] 89.9 +/- 15.1, % predicted forced vital capacity [FVC] 103.2 +/- 14.6). ROC-AUC's for all alternate markers were low for CFPD (0.52-0.67) and CFRD (0.56-0.61). At a cut point of 5.5%, HbA1c had 78% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.45-0.94) and 41% specificity (95% CI: 0.28-0.55) for identifying CFRD, correlating to a ROC-AUC of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.42-0.8). Conclusions All alternate markers tested demonstrate poor diagnostic accuracy for identifying CFRD by 2hG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available