Journal
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages 464-470Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.080
Keywords
Coagulation; Microalgae; Settling; Dewatering; Biofuels; Dose-response
Funding
- Erasmus Mundus Action 2 EXPERTS III [0478219/Contract 000000054361]
- Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO - Belgium) [12D8914N]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Flocculation holds great potential as a low-cost harvesting method for microalgae biomass production. Three flocculation methods (ferric chloride, chitosan, and alkaline flocculation) were compared in this study for the harvesting of 9 different freshwater and marine microalgae and one cyanobacterium species. Ferric chloride resulted in a separation efficiency greater than 90% with a concentration factor (CF) higher than 10 for all species. Chitosan flocculation worked generally very well for freshwater microalgae, but not for marine species. Alkaline flocculation was most efficient for harvesting of Nannochloropsis, Chlamydomonas and Chlorella sp. The concentration factor was highly variable between microalgae species. Generally, minimum flocculant dosages were highly variable across species, which shows that flocculation may be a good harvesting method for some species but not for others. This study shows that microalgae and cyanobacteria species should not be selected solely based on their productivity but also on their potential for low-cost separation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available