4.8 Article

Improvement on light penetrability and microalgae biomass production by periodically pre-harvesting Chlorella vulgaris cells with culture medium recycling

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 216, Issue -, Pages 669-676

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.011

Keywords

Microalgae; Photobioreactor; Light penetrability; Periodically pre-harvesting; Light attenuation

Funding

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51136007]
  2. International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51561145013]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Education [113053A]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112015CDJXY140003]
  5. Postdoctoral Scientific Research Project of Chongqing, China [Xm2015070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To improve light penetrability and biomass production in batch cultivation, a cultivation mode that periodically pre-harvesting partial microalgae cells from suspension with culture medium recycling was proposed. By daily pre-harvesting 30% microalgae cells from the suspension, the average light intensity in the photobioreactor (PBR) was enhanced by 27.05-122.06%, resulting in a 46.48% increase in total biomass production than that cultivated in batch cultivation without pre-harvesting under an incident light intensity of 160 mu mol m(-2) s(-1). Compared with the semi-continuous cultivation with 30% microalgae suspension daily replaced with equivalent volume of fresh medium, nutrients and water input was reduced by 60% in the proposed cultivation mode but with slightly decrease (12.82%) in biomass production. No additional nutrient was replenished when culture medium recycling. Furthermore, higher pre-harvesting ratios (40%, 60%) and lower pre-harvesting frequencies (every 2, 2.5 days) were not advantageous for the pre-harvesting cultivation mode. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available