4.6 Article

Activation of BDNF/TrkB/Akt pathway is associated with aggressiveness and unfavorable survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 1925-1936

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.13190

Keywords

biomarker; head and neck cancer; immunohistochemistry; predictive value; prognosis

Funding

  1. Postgraduate Research Group of the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
  2. Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education
  3. Sao Paulo State Research Foundation [2016/21785-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To evaluate the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), its tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB), and two downstream targets of this pathway, Akt and ribosomal protein S6 (RPS6), in normal oral mucosa (NOM), oral leukoplakia (OL), and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and correlate this expression with OSCC patients' outcomes, cell senescence, and stemness profile. Materials and Methods Ten cases of NOM, 32 OL, and 72 primary OSCC were included. Immunohistochemical analysis for BDNF, TrkB, p-TrkB, p-Akt, and p-RPS6 was performed. Cell senescence and stemness profile of OSCC were evaluated through p16 and BMI-1 immunohistochemical expression, respectively. The slides were scanned into high-resolution images and quantified through digital analysis. Results Oral squamous cell carcinoma presented increased expression of BDNF/TrkB/Akt pathway compared to NOM and OL. OSCC diagnosed in advanced clinical stages presented an upregulation of BDNF and p-TrkB. BDNF and p-Akt were identified as predictors of poor disease-specific survival. The increase in stemness profile was correlated with a decrease in p-TrkB and p-Akt expression. Conclusions BDNF/TrkB/Akt pathway is significantly increased in malignant cells from OSCC. Moreover, BDNF and Akt represent biomarkers capable to predict a poor prognosis of OSCC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available