4.3 Article

Identification of Potential Biomarkers in Peripheral Blood Supernatants of South African Patients with Syphilitic and Herpetic Uveitis

Journal

OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 299-307

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1674341

Keywords

Biomarkers; herpes; South Africa; syphilis; Uveitis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to identify potential diagnostic biomarkers for herpetic and syphilitic uveitis. Results showed three proteins in blood samples that differed between syphilitic and other causes, as well as a three-marker biosignature that separated syphilitic cases with high accuracy. Another biosignature differentiated herpetic cases from other causes with promising results. These findings suggest the potential for these biomarkers in distinguishing different etiologies of uveitis and warrant further investigation in larger studies.
Purpose: To identify potential diagnostic biomarkers for herpetic and syphilitic uveitis. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 92 uveitis patients. Concentrations of 47 biomarkers were evaluated in unstimulated Quantiferon supernatants using the Luminex platform. Results: Results showed 11 patients (12%) had herpetic uveitis, 11 (12%) syphilis, 40 (43.5%) other infectious causes, 16 (17.4%) established noninfectious causes and 14 (15.2%) were idiopathic. Biomarker analysis revealed three proteins (Apo-A1, Apo-CIII, CRP) that differed between syphilis and other causes. A three-marker biosignature (CCL4/MIP-1 beta, Apo-CIII and CRP) separated syphilis from other groups with AUC = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.68-0.98). Apo-CIII and CRP differed between herpetic cases and other groups (p < .05). A three-analyte biosignature (Apo-A1, SAP and CRP) separated the herpetic group from other groups with AUC = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.65-0.93). Conclusion: We have identified candidate biomarkers with potential to differentiate between herpetic, syphilitic and other causes of uveitis. These results warrant further investigation in larger future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available